Generation Gap

Too young for this, too old for that.

This is a column about generations. As in missing them, or being caught between them.

It is, of course, a situation not unique to my writing life. For example, I was too young for Grace Kelly, and now I’m too old for Amy Adams. Don’t think that doesn’t bug me every day.

On a more rational note, I was born in the waning days of World War II and thus am not part of “The Greatest Generation,” which beat the Nazis. World War II is considered a just war, and provided a clarity of purpose that many subsequent conflicts have, to say the least, lacked. In WWII, we were attacked, everyone enlisted and went to fight enemies so cartoonishly evil that, 70 years later, they can still be trotted out in books and films to evoke a visceral reaction.

Now, someone does something bad to us, and by the time a soldier finishes basic training, he or she is sent to fight someone else (usually by some politician who never got closer to a uniform than watching a movie about the Nazis).

And I don’t quite fit in with the Baby Boomers that the “Greatest Generation” lustily generated, although I do feel some kinship with them, as our so-called “entitlements,” such as Social Security and Medicare, are assaulted by what I’ve termed the “Ungrateful Generation.”

Cosmic moral considerations aside (including the Grace Kelly/Amy Adams thing), writers can have problems with being in the wrong generation. Especially mystery and thriller writers such as myself. Not to put too fine a point on it, science and technology (both real and Hollywood-pseudo) have robbed the genre of much of its charm and made writers (including screenwriters) lazy.

Again, such as myself.

In the good old days, circa 1940 or 1950, the private eye and the cops (who put up with him because he used to be a flatfoot) would stand over a body in a hotel room. Even when there is a good suspect, things will then mosey along at a leisurely pace. 

COP IN CHARGE: “He won’t get away. Clancy, dust for prints and put out an A.P.B. Check all the bus, railway stations, and airports. Set up roadblocks. It’s only a matter of time.”

The private eye smiles and lights up a Lucky Strike. He would bet his trench coat that it won’t be that easy. And he’s right. The suspect is not quickly apprehended because he is hiding out in a remote mountain cabin with his moll, who looks nothing like Grace Kelly or Amy Adams, but certainly looks like someone you want to be holed up with in a remote cabin.

(By this point, readers and/or filmgoers are rooting for the fugitive.)

Both the police and the private eye spend days trying to find him, and there are more plot twists than there are Viagra commercials during the nightly news.

But now:   

COP IN CHARGE: “He won’t get away. We’ll ‘ping’ the GPS chip in his phone and triangulate his position between three cell towers. What’s that, Clancy, you already did that and he’s in custody? Great. Let’s get some donuts. I’m hungry.”

At which point the private eye lights up a filtered Virginia Slim and is immediately arrested for smoking indoors.

Between video surveillance cameras, which are apparently everywhere, and DNA analysis, “perps,” in print or on the screen, don’t have a chance anymore, at least until the case is thrown out in court on a technicality.

In the days of noir, without hard evidence, the police usually had to beat confessions out of suspects in a room with a couple of chairs and a lamp. (They rarely used the furniture; they used truncheons.) And the confession held up in court, the only technicality being whether the killer got AC or DC in the electric chair.   

But no longer.

Imagine the scenario today, in which a Gorgeous Female Cop (who does look like Amy Adams) is facing a smiling killer and his Nattily Dressed Lawyer across a table in a brightly lit interrogation room with a one-way mirror, behind which stands a slew of supercilious forensic experts.

N.D.L.: If you have nothing else, Lieutenant, my client and I are leaving. Come on, Nigel.

G.F.C. (holding up a small vial): Not so fast, counselor. Do you see what’s in this?

N.D.L. (leans in): Looks like a dead mosquito. (Laughs.) My client didn’t have anything to do with it.

G.F.C.: Very funny. But this mosquito was trapped in the room where the six people your client murdered were found. On a hunch, we checked the DNA of the blood it ingested and it didn’t match any of the victims. But it matches your client’s. Do you want to explain how his blood got into a mosquito in the murder room when he claims to have been at a Knicks game?

(Behind the mirror one of the forensic experts says, “What a lame alibi. Who the hell goes to a Knicks game?”)

Of course, the killer pleads down to attempted jaywalking, but that’s another story.     

Lawrence De Maria, a former Pulitzer Prize-nominated New York Times journalist, has published 12 e-books on His next thriller, featuring private eye Alton Rhode, is due out this month. He’s desperate. It may contain the mosquito plot, so don’t steal it.

comments powered by Disqus